Aim for your personal best!
This month’s Chicago style workout, “Grammar, Part 4,” focuses on paragraphs 5.39–51 of CMOS 17, which cover personal pronouns, including their possessive and reflexive forms. There’s also one question about demonstrative pronouns (CMOS 5.52).
(Hint: You don’t need to know all the terminology to take the quiz, but it will help if you know a little.)
Subscribers to The Chicago Manual of Style Online may click through to the linked sections of the Manual (cited in the answers). (We also offer a 30-day free trial of CMOS Online.)
Note: Style guides and dictionaries sometimes disagree. This quiz is designed to test your knowledge of The Chicago Manual of Style.
[Editor’s note: This quiz relies on and links to the 17th edition of CMOS.]
Chicago Style Workout 40: Grammar, Part 4
Photo: Bowling at Camp Zama, by Sgt. John L. Carkeet IV, US Army Japan, licensed under CC BY 2.0.
Ready for another quiz? Click here for the full list.
Please see our commenting policy.
So with number 6. there isn’t enough information to make the correct determination. And the explanation allows for either answer to be correct depending on the speaker’s meaning: I assumed it to be saying the sister looks more like their father than the speaker looks like the father. But apparently, the intention was that the sister looks more like her father than she looks like the speaker. It is an ambiguous sentence and I would definitely reword it to remove the ambiguity. CMOS explanation:
“If the question is whether the sister or the speaker looks more like their father, the pronoun should be nominative because it is the subject of an understood verb {my sister looks more like our father than I do}. But if the question is whether the father or the speaker looks more like the sister, the pronoun should be objective because it is the object of a preposition in an understood clause {my sister looks more like my father than she looks like me}.” So either pronoun is potentially correct, but it would be better to reword the sentence to avoid the ambiguity.”